Reviews from

THE TRINING Book Three

Viewing comments for Chapter 2 "INTERROGATION OF ZURN (PART 1)"
JOURNEY INTO REDEMPTION

23 total reviews 
Comment from Jacqueline M Franklin
Excellent
Not yet exceptional. When the exceptional rating is reached this is highlighted

Hey, Jay...

Hmmmm. So, it would seem that Zurn may get off an a 'technicality' of sorts? Because if he showed Doctrex what he did against the fire people, then he really didn't desert - technically speaking.

Of course, I could have it all wrong. I know. It's hard to accept, but I will admit it did happen back in 1972.

Cheers & Blessings
Keep Smilin'.... Jax (*.*)

 Comment Written 04-Oct-2014


reply by the author on 04-Oct-2014
    You leadin' me on, girl. What happened in '72? Thanks for your input on this, Jax. Hey, good luck in the book of the month offering.
reply by Jacqueline M Franklin on 04-Oct-2014
    LOL... 1972, I realized the mistake I made marrying hubby #1. A mistake I did not correct until 1991.

    Thx so much --- it is quite nerve-wracking waiting for the vote!
Comment from c_lucas
Excellent
Not yet exceptional. When the exceptional rating is reached this is highlighted

A man can be slow with his thoughts, but that doesn't make his retarded. This is very well written with a smooth flow of words, making for a very interesting read.

This rating does not count towards story rating or author rank.
The highest and the lowest rating are not included in calculations.

 Comment Written 04-Oct-2014


reply by the author on 04-Oct-2014
    Thanks, Charlie. Appreciate your input.
reply by c_lucas on 05-Oct-2014
    You're welcome, Jay. Charlie
Comment from barbara.wilkey
Excellent
Not yet exceptional. When the exceptional rating is reached this is highlighted

I am much happier. I knew Zurn wouldn't desert. It was a huge misunderstanding.

"I refuse to convict him without his having a military hearing. (The 'his' doesn't sound right. I would use him or omit it and just say without having...)

This rating does not count towards story rating or author rank.
The highest and the lowest rating are not included in calculations.

 Comment Written 04-Oct-2014


reply by the author on 04-Oct-2014
    I think I agree with you about "his". It is correct grammatically, but doesn't sound right when spoken. I changed it, leaving out "his" and "having". Thanks for the assistance, Barbara.