Comment from prettybluebirds

Excellent

I'm sure the Supreme Court would be happy to pass your law. It's not as outrageous as much of the stuff they do. That is a good entry for the contest. I wish you the best of luck.

 Comment Written 01-Jul-2024

---

reply by the author on 01-Jul-2024

Thanks so much for taking the time to read and review! Thank you also for the five beautiful stars.

Comment from Ulla

Excellent

So much is going on these days some of which we won't hear before it's either passed or has become law. As the world is turning more and more totalitarian, including the West and especially America, if Trump is having a say, you will find that your reasonable request is a rather futile one. Ulla:)))

 Comment Written 01-Jul-2024

---

reply by the author on 01-Jul-2024

Thanks so much for taking the time to read and review! Thank you also for the five beautiful stars.

Comment from Sandra Stoner-Mitchell

Excellent

That is a good one. By the time the information gets to us, it is usually so highly inflated that it's not in the least possible! Being the first one, you get the truth. Well done, this was a really good law we need to pass. Good luck in the contest. :) Sandra xx

 Comment Written 01-Jul-2024

---

reply by the author on 01-Jul-2024

Thanks a lot Sandra for taking the time to read and review: "The Law of First Telling". Not everyone has responded in the affirming way that you have. Therefore, I hope you don't mind but, I have already sent your review to the Supreme Court naming you as a co-author of the law! HeeHee:-)

reply by Sandra Stoner-Mitchell on 01-Jul-2024

That's fine!! LOL Go for it. xxx

Comment from Begin Again

Excellent

Hmm...an interesting thought! But who decides who should be the most important one and what they should hear...should pain, grief, hoss, or any feeling be considered? How do we know if it was a lie from the beginning? Or maybe it's all over my head and I should go back to bed, pull the covers up and get some sleep.

 Comment Written 01-Jul-2024

---

reply by the author on 01-Jul-2024

Hmmm......... Now you've gone and done it! You have rejected an element of cogent repartee into my fantasy. L O L They truly are great questions but . . . far beyond my pay grade. (That's why I wanted to bypass everything and everybody and get this right to the Supreme Court and have them seal it.) Thanks.
This is all over my cognitive abilities so I am going back to bed, pulling the covers up and getting some sleep.

Comment from Debi Pick Marquette

Exceptional

I just have to say, huh? What? Excuse me? Did I hear this right? LOL
Sounds like someone who has some intelligence.. After all I am not used to someone talking and having him know what he is talking about. I am so not used to hearing someone talking things that I don't know about.

So great job as being such an intellect as I do not normally have a hard time following, but you were so interesting and yet I didn't have a clue. I think you meant to do that, so you are a very clever talker. Awesome job, my friend. Did you follow me that time? Haha. I

I did follow you as I just thought it such an intellectual way of saying you would rather not hear it thru the grapevine, and if you have to then the consequences could be rubbing the back or even other places. Or your choice. Oh you are good!! LOL..

I love your serious take on this. Good job of writing too. Hahaha! Did I have you confused for a little bit too? Awesome post!

 Comment Written 30-Jun-2024

---

reply by the author on 30-Jun-2024

Thank you for both reading and reviewing my tongue in cheek plea for being the first to hear about it. (If I hadn't said it the way I said it, I would've said it exactly the way you said it, word for word! Good job young lady in getting my thoughts through clairvoyance.)Thank you very much for the five stars.

Comment from royowen

Excellent

Actually I must admit even though a story has been reported a few times, we call all claim that this this new writing is a new, and has the personal stamp of the teller. even though it's repetitive, but maybe not the first time, beautifully written, good luck, blessing, Roy

 Comment Written 30-Jun-2024

---

reply by the author on 30-Jun-2024

Thank you for both reading and reviewing my tongue in cheek plea for being the first to hear about it. Thank you very much for the five stars.

Comment from BethShelby

Excellent

This sounds like it has some merit and also some possible drawbacks. It is possible the one who has the most to lost or gain from the telling might be reluctant to have the information leaked in the first place. Also if the higher bloodpressure test in involved sometimes the story becomes more potent as it is passed along with creative interruptations being added with each successive telling. However if the supreme courts actually rules on anything within rate of time I'll go along with it. Good Luck

 Comment Written 30-Jun-2024

---

reply by the author on 30-Jun-2024

Thank you for both reading and reviewing. Yeah, I think you're probably right Beth. Probably it's all for nothing. Probably the Supreme Court ain't gonna look at it. Well that's a good idea I had to try it.
Thank you very much for the five stars.

Comment from Pamusart

Excellent

Hi

This looks like a good entry for the contest. Good luck with that!!

This is actually the first entry I've reviewed for this contest. I'm still trying to digest it.

I would say anything that needs a new law should go all the way to the Supreme Court if necessary. I don't trust the Supreme Court like I did the Supreme Court four years ago five years ago. The Supreme Court doesn't care about precedent anymore.

You have raised some interesting questions in this area

I enjoyed reading your poem

Good job. Thank you for sharing.



This rating does not count towards story rating or author rank.
The highest and the lowest rating are not included in calculations.

 Comment Written 30-Jun-2024

---

reply by the author on 30-Jun-2024

Thank you for both reading and reviewing . Thank you very much for the five stars.