7 months ago
Kamala picks Walz
<< Thread Modifed August 6 at 10:02AM >>
Here's the good, the bad, and the ugly about Tim Walz. Not covering boring stuff here that you can read up on elsewhere.
THE GOOD
Walz has a military record, not anything to compare to Vance, but he was in the Army National Guard for over 20 years, retiring as a Master Sergeant. He is pro-gun but has moderate enough views to pacify his constituents.
Walz has real governing experience, which Harris does not.
He is a Minnesota Lutheran, and seems to be easy-going.
He shares the last name of great actor.
THE BAD
A long-time schoolteacher, Walz is against merit-based pay in public schools. He will need to explain in the VP debate how this approach won't run American public schools even further into the ground.
THE UGLY
Walz has a 100% rating from NARAL, just like Kamala. Together they will join forces ripping ripe young puppies from their mothers' wombs, chomping and slurping their luscious juices, grinding their bones into Elmer's Glue, and selling it to Democratic voters with a Christmas bow. Remember that it's mostly ethnic minorities and especially Black people who are exterminated by the abortion industry. Part of this country was built on the backs of slaves, and now we'll be using aborted baby glue to hold it together, strengthening our roads and bridges and at the same time keeping that underclass minority breeding in check.
And for a 60-year-old, Walz looks pretty damn old, but who's judging.
7 months ago
RE: Kamala picks Walz
The GOOD is VERY GOOD!
The so-called 'BAD' is...meh!
And the UGLY is darnright ridiculous.
An excellent choice by Harris that will help her 'walz' into the White House come next January. :-)
7 months ago
RE: Kamala picks Walz
What's downright ridiculous is that you, a supposed liberal, are this far backwards on protecting the least protected minority of all.
7 months ago
RE: Kamala picks Walz
Strong words there, Simian. Simmer down.
Not sure what you're referring to, but if it's abortion, my stance is that I'm pro choice--up to a point--for about the first 4 weeks or so of pregnancy, where a woman can choose to terminate.
After a certain point--perhaps 6 weeks--the pregnancy should be carried through till birth, unless at the health risk of the mother.
I can be viewed/judged as centrist/moderate on this issue--not all pro choice nor all pro life.
7 months ago
RE: Kamala picks Walz
Well if you think pregnancy should be carried through with after six weeks, your positions are more closely aligned with the legal restrictions on abortion put in place in say Texas and Florida. Harris and Walz have voting records allowing abortions under any circumstance and any point in or after gestation. Trump has actually taken a hyper consistent position (one of his few) that abortion should be left to the states. In fact, he has taken a lot of flak for that recently from the right.
