To err or not to err ... unsolvable?
Indeed, to be adjudged in each respect
defended or defined, resolvable?
Explain in that such thought, in-depth, be checked.
Had thou oppugned this more subjectively?
Wherein to call into dispute the truth;
misspeak, refuting one's integrity?
Such bald uproar, methinks, would seem uncouth.
Instead, Divine recourse, I would adopt!
Assured objectively as one who errs
is man - reprieve, an act of God, co-opt.
Engrace, it's indeed best! This, then we share.
Whereas, in fact, 'oft we judge this and that;
yet me, nor he or she like tit for tat.
|
Author Notes
My third Sonnet in my sonnet a week for the remainder of 2022
First quatrain: Question whether "to err or not to err" can be defended or defined. Can you come to a point of resolution or resignation?
Second quatrain: the challenge: is the question objective or subjective, putting the questioner in a defensive posture on shaky grounds explaining that personal (subjective questioning) could be seen as objectionable and risky?
Third quatrain: Here, the argument takes a turn - bringing into view ... if the question of erring is subjective, then is it proper to recognize that humans error and offering forgiveness is Godly?
Couplet: Summarizes that in our "free will," we often judge objective things at the drop of a hat. But we, nor our fellow earth-bound travelers want the same treatment.
Note: past tense: oppugned; call into question the truth or validity of.
thanks for the use of: Don't Judge by lynnkah on FanArtReview.com
|
